The Brant County Record

Planning and Development Committee

April 4, 2023

Who was there

Present (10): David Bailey, John Bell, Robert Chambers, Brian Coleman, Garneau, Steve Howes, Jennifer Kyle, John MacAlpine, David Miller, Lukas Oakley

Absent (1): John Peirce

Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.

What was decided (11 motions)

9 carried, 2 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

That the agenda for the April 4, 2023, Planning and Development Committee be approved, as amended with an additional correspondence under Communications.
Moved by Councillor Miller, seconded by Mayor Bailey
Carried
That the Planning and Development Committee minutes of February 7, 2023, be approved.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor Howes
Carried
That clause c. be struck out and replaced with: That not withstanding the fact that the proposed cellular tower location fails to meet the County of Brant's Telecommunications Tower Protocol in regard to Natural Heritage setback, none the less the Planning and Development Committee is supportive of the proposed location.
Moved by Councillor Miller, seconded by Mayor Bailey
Carried
That the Clerk be directed to inform Shared Tower Inc (STC): a. That LandSquared on behalf of Shared Tower Inc. (STC) has completed consultation with the County of Brant and the public; and b. That the Telecommunication Tower as proposed at 510 Brant-Waterloo Road is not in accordance with Section 4.iii – ‘Preferred Location Guidelines’ of the ‘Communication Tower and Communication Antenna Preferred Location Protocol (2020); and c. That not withstanding the fact that the proposed cellular tower location fails to meet the County of Brant's Telecommunications Tower Protocol in regard to Natural Heritage setbacks, the Planning and Development Committee is supportive of the proposed location.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor MacAlpine
Carried
That the Zoning By-law Amendment application proposing to rezone the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Suburban Residential (SR) with site specific provision XX (SR-XX), in order to permit area of approximately 747 square metres (0.18 acres), whereas a minimum of 1,000 square metres (0.25 acres) is required; to permit a frontage of 9.19 metres (30.15 feet), whereas a minimum 20 metres (65.62 feet) is required; to permit exterior side yard setback of 5.0 metres (16.40 feet), whereas a minimum of 7.5 metres (24.61 feet) is required; and to facilitate a future residential severance, be received as information and any comments/ submissions regarding this application be
Moved by Councillor Miller, seconded by Councillor Oakley
Referred
That the first clause of the main motion be struck out and replaced with the following: That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA38-20-DN from MHBC Planning, Agent, on behalf of Grover Developments Ltd, Applicant/ Owner of lands legally described as Plan 727, Lot 98 & Lot 99, in the geographic Township of Burford, municipally known as 6 Maple Ave North, proposing to change the zoning on the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Residential Multiple Low Density, limited to detached and semi detached only (RM1), subject to a ‘Holding Provision (h-RM1)’ being applied to the entirety of the Subject Lands until such time that a desirable and appropriate level of municipal servicing is available, determined and guided by the completion of the Burford Master Servicing Class Environmental Assessment to the satisfaction of the County of Brant, be approved.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor Miller
Defeated
That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA38-20-DN from MHBC Planning, Agent, on behalf of Grover Developments Ltd, Applicant/ Owner of lands legally described as Plan 727, Lot 98 & Lot 99, in the geographic Township of Burford, municipally known as 6 Maple Ave North, proposing to change the zoning on the subject lands from Suburban Residential (SR) to Residential Multiple Low Density (RM1) subject to a ‘Holding Provision (h-RM1)’ being applied to the entirety of the Subject Lands until such time that a desirable and appropriate level of municipal servicing is available, determined and guided by the completion of the Burford Master Servicing Class Environmental Assessment to the satisfaction of the County of Brant, be approved; And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows: The application represents desirable infill redevelopment, permitting a range of housing types within an established neighborhood, utilizing existing surrounding infrastructure and amenities. The Holding Provision (h) will determine the timing for desirable and appropriate development of the subject lands based on planned and/or available services; The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; and The application is in conformity with the policies of the County of Brant Official Plan (2012) and meets the general intent of Zoning By-Law 61-16.
Moved by Councillor Oakley, seconded by Councillor Coleman
Carried
That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA4-23-DN from The Angrish Group, Agent, on behalf of Nick Vahrmeyer, Applicant/ Owner of lands legally described as Part Lot 23, East of Fairchilds Creek, Part Lot 41, River Range, East of Fairchilds Creek; Part Lot 9 South of John Street, Part Lot 9 North of Cedar Street, Plan 103, in the Geographic Township of Onondaga and municipally known as 524 Old Onondaga Road East, County of Brant, proposing the following to Zoning By-Law 61-16: 1. To allow the application of a Special Exemption to the Residential Hamlet and Villages (RH-27) zone to permit a minimum lot frontage of 12.5 metres (41 feet), whereas a minimum of 30 metres (98 feet) is required; 2. To allow the application of a Special Exemption to the Agricultural (A-193) zone to recognize the remaining undersized area of the agricultural portion having an area of 5.3 hectares (13 acres); and 3. To permit an expansion of the Natural Heritage (NH) Zone to incorporate a 30 metre buffer from the identified watercourse, be approved; 8 And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows: The Applicants have demonstrated the adequate access to the remaining farm parcel; Potential nuisance issues between the farm and non-farm related uses are protected under the rules and procedures of the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board (NFPPB); The application is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement and in conformity with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horsesho
Moved by Councillor Coleman, seconded by Councillor Miller
Carried
That the Agricultural Advisory Committee Minutes of February 13, 2023, be received as information.
Moved by Mayor Bailey, seconded by Councillor Bell
Carried
That RPT-0144-23 be received; and That the current County of Brant Committee of Adjustment structure continue (OPTION 1); and That a by-law adopting the Terms of Reference for the County of Brant Committee of Adjustment be prepared and forwarded to Council for approval.
Moved by Councillor Oakley, seconded by Councillor MacAlpine
Carried
That the memo from Development Services regarding an update to the Interim Control By-law, be received.
Moved by Councillor Howes, seconded by Councillor Oakley
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.