Everything on this site is searchable — a file number, a councillor, a motion, a meeting, or an application.
Committee of Adjustment
November 21, 2019
What was decided (4 motions)
4 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE IS: THAT the Application be APPROVED. Having regard for the criteria under Section 45 (1) of the Planning Act, The decision is based upon the following reason(s): • The proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 61-16; • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and • The proposal conforms to the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Provincial Policy Statement.
Moved by D. Zulauf, seconded by H. Emmott
Carried
THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE IS: THAT the Application be APPROVED with revised wording. Having regard for the criteria under Section 45 (1) of the Planning Act, The decision is based upon the following reason(s): • The proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 61-16; • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and • The proposal conforms to the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Provincial Policy Statement.
Moved by R. Smith with revised wording, seconded by S. Schmitt
Carried
THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE IS: THAT the Application be APPROVED with noted and additional conditions. Having regard for the criteria under Section 45 (1) of the Planning Act, The decision is based upon the following reason(s): Committee of Adjustment Meeting Minutes November 21, 2019 7 • The proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 61-16; • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and • The proposal conforms to the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Provincial Policy Statement. Opposed by J. Vamos and D. Zulauf
Moved by R. Smith, seconded by S. Schmitt
Carried
THE DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE IS: THAT the Application be APPROVED with noted and additional conditions. Having regard for the criteria under Section 45 (1) of the Planning Act, The decision is based upon the following reason(s): • The proposed variance is in keeping with the general intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 61-16; • The relief requested is considered minor in nature and is desirable for the appropriate development and use of the subject land; and • The proposal conforms to the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Provincial Policy Statement.
Moved by D. Zulauf subject to noted conditions, seconded by S. Schmitt