The Brant County Record

County of Brant Council

July 9, 2024

Who was there

Present (9): John Bell, Robert Chambers, Brian Coleman, Steve Howes, Jennifer Kyle, John MacAlpine, David Miller, Lukas Oakley, John Peirce

Absent (1): Garneau

Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.

What was decided (9 motions)

9 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

That the agenda for the July 9, 2024 County of Brant Council meeting, be approved; And that Section 4.e of the Procedural By-law be suspended to allow report RPT-0374- 24 to be considered as it is not a Planning Act matter.
Moved by Councillor Chambers, seconded by Councillor MacAlpine
Carried
That the delegation from James Webb re: 15.1 By-law Number 61-24, Being a By- law to amend By-Law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law for the County of Brant, as amended (61 Bethel Road) be received as information.
Moved by Councillor Coleman, seconded by Councillor MacAlpine
Carried
That Application ZBA9-24-HH from Bob Phillips, Agent on behalf of Brian and Wendy Pigott, Owners of lands legally known as Range 2 South Hammond Road Part Lots 6 to 8, municipally known as 138 Langford Church Road, Geographic Township of Brantford, County of Brant, proposing to rezone a portion of the subject lands from Agriculture (A) to Special Exception Agriculture (A-196) to recognize an existing undersized agricultural parcel, be approved; and That the following site specific provision is being recommended for approval: 1. To permit a reduced total lot area of 22.4 hectares (55.35 acres), whereas a total lot area of 40 hectares (98.8 acres) is required. 2. All other provisions of the By-Law shall apply; And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows: • The application is in conformity with the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and consistent with the policies of Provincial Policy Statement. • The application is in conformity with the general intent of the policies of the Official Plan and Zoning By-Law.
Moved by Councillor Peirce, seconded by Councillor Coleman
Carried
That Zoning By-Law Amendment Application ZBA8-24-DN received from JHC Engineering Agent, on behalf of Applicant UTOVA Enterprises Inc on behalf of 1000399788 Ontario Ltd c/o K. Spierenburg Owner of Brantford Concession 5 Part Lots 1 and 2, County of Brant, in the geographic former township of Brantford, located at 1318 Colborne Street West proposing to amend the zoning on the subject lands from Agricultural (A) to Light Industrial (M2) to permit future development of the lands for industrial uses and Agricultural (A) to Agricultural - Special Exemption (A- XX) to recognize the remaining undersized parcel of 35 hectares (86 acres) as result of future severance applications, be approved; And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows: a. The Application conforms to the policies of the Official Plan and is in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By-Law. b. The Application is consistent with the policies of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and consistency with the policies of Provincial Policy Statement.
Moved by Councillor Oakley, seconded by Councillor Bell
Carried
That Application ZBA7/24/HH from J.H Cohoon Engineering Ltd, Agent on behalf of Taylor and Lisa Whiting, Owners of lands described as Concession 1 Part Lot 6 Registered Plan 2R-4504 PART 1 in the Former Township of Oakland, municipally known as 19 King Street South, County of Brant proposing to rezone the subject lands from Agricultural (A) to Special Exception-Suburban Residential (SR-62 & SR- 63) and to Natural Heritage (NH1) as outlined within the amending By-Law; and That the application is being recommended for approval with the following site specific provisions: 1. SR-62 to permit a reduced lot frontage of 15 meters on a portion of the subject lands; whereas 30 meters is required within the Suburban Residential (SR) zone; 2. SR-63 in recognition of the existing non-residential use, that a ‘Contractor’s Yard’ shall be permitted, altered, expanded or enlarged in accordance with the provisions and regulations of the Agricultural (A) Zone and at the time of expansion and/or enlargement of the use and/or building or structure, a ‘Visual Barriers’ shall be required in accordance with the provisions of the by-law, where a non-residential zone or use abuts any lot line of a residential zone or use; 3. NH-1 to incorporate a 10 metre Natural Heritage Vegetative Protection Zone (NH1) protection buffer; County of Brant Council Minutes Page 5 Tuesday, July 9, 2024 And that the reason(s) for approval are as follows: a. Permitting a reduced lot frontage will facilitate a subsequent P
Moved by Councillor MacAlpine, seconded by Councillor Coleman
Carried
That Brant County Council convene In Camera to discuss S.239(2)(c) A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the municipality or local board (RPT-0374- 24 Apps' Mill Nature Centre) - P. Mete.
Moved by Councillor Miller, seconded by Councillor Coleman
Carried
That the following By-laws be read a first time, as amended: 1. By-law Number 61-24, Being a By-law to amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (61 Bethel Road). 2. By-law Number 62-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (138 Langford Church Road). 3. By-law Number 63-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (1318 Colborne Street West). 4. By-law Number 64-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (19 King Street South). 5. By-law Number 65-24, Being a By-law to confirm the proceedings of Council.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor Peirce
Carried
That the following By-laws be read a second time and all clauses and preambles be adopted: 1. By-law Number 61-24, Being a By-law to amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (61 Bethel Road). 2. By-law Number 62-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (138 Langford Church Road). 3. By-law Number 63-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (1318 Colborne Street West). 4. By-law Number 64-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (19 King Street South). 5. By-law Number 65-24, Being a By-law to confirm the proceedings of Council.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor Peirce
Carried
That the following By-laws be read a third time, passed, signed and executed: 1. By-law Number 61-24, Being a By-law to amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (61 Bethel Road). 2. By-law Number 62-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (138 Langford Church Road). 3. By-law Number 63-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (1318 Colborne Street West). 4. By-law Number 64-24, Being a By-law to further amend By-law Number 61-16, being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the County of Brant, as amended (19 King Street South). 5. By-law Number 65-24, Being a By-law to confirm the proceedings of Council.
Moved by Councillor Bell, seconded by Councillor Peirce
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.